<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Net Neutrality&#8230;A Disturbing Trend</title>
	<atom:link href="http://reinventingerica.com/2006/09/18/net-neutralitya-disturbing-trend/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://reinventingerica.com/2006/09/18/net-neutralitya-disturbing-trend/</link>
	<description>Because Who Wants to Fail in Obscurity?</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://reinventingerica.com/2006/09/18/net-neutralitya-disturbing-trend/#comment-1011</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 05:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://reinventingerica.com/misc/net-neutralitya-disturbing-trend#comment-1011</guid>
		<description>Its simply a way for the ISPs to bill people twice for the same bandwidth, because in reality, all the bandwidth is already paid for.  The end-user (consumer, business, etc.) pays to access the net.  Content providers (websites, VoIP companies, etc.) are paying to access the net.  So basically, they are saying that they want to charge content providers AGAIN for the same bandwidth they are already paying for or else they will give them crappy service.  Its a con job to charge more money is all it is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its simply a way for the ISPs to bill people twice for the same bandwidth, because in reality, all the bandwidth is already paid for.  The end-user (consumer, business, etc.) pays to access the net.  Content providers (websites, VoIP companies, etc.) are paying to access the net.  So basically, they are saying that they want to charge content providers AGAIN for the same bandwidth they are already paying for or else they will give them crappy service.  Its a con job to charge more money is all it is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.252 seconds -->
